Month: February 2025

The Sydney Harbour Bridge

The Sydney Harbour Bridge

Today the Sydney Harbour Bridge spans the beautiful and now famous harbour of Sydney, Australia. Tourists flock to explore the harbourside city at the bottom of the world. The Sydney Opera House, well known for its white concrete sails, sits close and just below the grey steel bridge that unites the city, north and south.

But of course, these structures are modern in the overall scheme of things. Australia is a new country compared to Europe and Britain. Its geographic isolation kept it secret and separate until just a few centuries ago. Then Britain colonised its shores in the late 1700s and used the Great Southern Land as a penal colony for surplus convicts.

The dream of a bridge

As early as 1815, architect Francis Greenway proposed a bridge to unite the north and south sides of the vast Sydney harbour. Development of the new city only focused on the south side of the city. Greenway was a convict himself until paroled by the then Governor Macquarie. Francis Greenway was born in Gloucestershire, England. He had a promising career as an architect in the Bristol area until the firm went bankrupt. In March 1812, Greenway was found guilty of the capital charge of forgery. His sentence was commuted to transportation for 14 years to the colony of New South Wales.

Britain’s loss was Australia’s gain. Francis Greenway went on to be the civil architect for Sydney and design many of Sydney’s colonial landmarks that still stand. Governor Lachlan Macquarie employed Greenway’s skills wisely and well.

Governor Macquarie was from Scotland and was an uncle of my Scottish grandmother, Mary Macquarie. Unfortunately, Macquarie did not consider the bridge to be a priority and so it never happened till much later after these two men passed.

A bridge unrealised for many years

Throughout the next century, the 19th, other bridge enthusiasts came and went. However, by the 20th century, the lack of a way across the harbour became more of a priority. People on the north side of the harbour could only access the city and beyond by ferry or punt. This left the beautiful northern side of the harbour quite underdeveloped. The wheels of progress can be slow at times and unfortunately, by the time a draft design for a bridge eventuated, World War I erupted.

Only after the terrible war ended and peace returned did the idea resurface. In 1922, a steel arch bridge was proposed to cross from Dawes Point in the south to Milson’s Point on the northern side, now called the North Shore. The chief engineer was Dr John Bradfield, already the engineer for the Department of Public Works.  Bradfield dreamed of making Sydney the greatest city in the Pacific. Indeed, he had grand ambitions even thinking of another bridge from the North Head to South Head further towards the coastline.

Bradfield did not design the bridge only propose it. It was Ralph Freeman who designed the simple single arch with decorative not functional pylons. Bradfield did not like this design, and the men fought badly both claiming to be the sole designer. When it came to the official plaque, the fight for recognition was really on. The highway across the bridge became the Bradfield Highway and instead, King George VI knighted Freeman for his services.

Work begins on the Sydney Harbour Bridge

Work on the Sydney Harbour bridge started in 1923. This necessitated the demolition of hundreds of houses, shops, hotels and businesses. The authorities did not offer these displaced people anywhere to go or recompence for their property lost. The people moved south, and tent cities sprouted up on the south side of the city near La Perouse. Others moved in with their families. To fund the bridge the government borrowed money from overseas. This caused huge problems when the Great Depression came in 1930. The 1929 Stock crash on Wall Street meant banks started to call in debts. The Australian economy struggled with its funding. Unemployment and homelessness rose steeply.

However, the bridge construction gave work to many, including my grandfather. The bridge united the city in hope at a dark time during the early 1930s. Nicknamed the Iron Lung of the city, the construction employed 1654 workers and kept Sydney alive through the Great Depression. When one shift of riveters or painters finished another surge of workers clocked on. This shared the work between as many men as possible to keep families financially afloat. 4000 men worked on the construction over ten years.

Bridge work was dangerous

Work on the huge steel bridge construction was very dangerous. There were no safety nets or other precautions against falls. Nor did the workers wear safety clothing or helmets as they do today. Sixteen men died by falling either from the arch or pylons or dying at the surrounding work sites. Read about them here.

Most Sydneysiders were unaware of these tragedies.

Set in the early decades of 20th century Sydney, this historical novel completes the tale of two sisters, Winnie and Francesca.

“Those who gave their lives for the bridge were barely acknowledged,” explains Caroline Mackaness, co-author of Bridging Sydney and curator of the exhibition of the same name at the Museum of Sydney.

“The politicians clearly did not want to spoil what was meant to be a joyous occasion, especially at a time of Depression, by drawing attention to the negatives,” she said.

The dramatic bridge opening

Finally, in March 1932, the bridge was complete. The opening ceremony however was plagued by political issues and made world news. For some months, there was civil unrest due to political issues concerning welfare payments and funding for government services. One disgruntled group called the New Guard was opposed to the premier Jack Lang. He was in favour of not repaying the overseas loan but instead helping Sydney and its people. The New Guard feared a revolution and even communism so lobbied to the Governor to have Lang dismissed.

The activist New Guard was also furious that Lang was opening the bridge instead of the king or the governor. As a result of this, Captain Francis de Groot of the New Guard gate crashed the ceremony on horseback and, using a sword, slashed the ceremonial ribbon himself before Premier Lang could do so.

The dead workers honoured

The premier, Jack Lang, made no mention of the deaths. However, the Minister for Public Works laid a modest plaque honouring the men.  It is above the steps on the southern approaches to the bridge but today, it is easily missed by passing pedestrians.

In 2007, the workers who died for their bridge received recognition on the 75th anniversary of the opening. Also, a new plaque was laid in their honour. More can be learnt at the Museum of Sydney located at the corner of Phillip and Bridge streets.

Crossing the Sydney Harbour Bridge

During the opening, an estimated half of the population of Sydney walked across the bridge. This was about 600, 000 people.

In 1982, on the 50th anniversary, about the same number crossed by foot again. By then, you could also cross by car or train. many celebrated this anniversary on ferries or other watercraft or on the nearby foreshores. Sydneysiders love their bridge! Today there are bridge tours and bridge climbs available to the public if you are not height wary.

The Sydney Harbour Bridge remained the symbol of Sydney for many years until the Opera House, built nearby, stole its limelight. It is amazing to reflect that these two structures like many other amazing buildings around the world were built on the sweat of physical workers. No computers, calculators or mobile phones can claim any credit.

Every New Year’s Eve, millions of people gather on the harbour or its foreshores to watch the fireworks herald in the new Year. Australia is always one of the first places in the world to see the new year or century. Our time zone like New Zealand’s is about ten hours ahead of the Uk and Europe.

Read what it was like in the days of the bridge construction in Vashti Farrer’s small book, Sydney Harbour Bridge. Vashti uses the unique voices of two children to tell her Australian story. I read this book and a few others before writing my own historical novel, Last Time Forever which tells the story of two sisters who, at the time and up to 1950, lived in Sydney. Based on the true-life story of my grandparents.

 

 

 

The Tragic Romanov Sisters of Russia

The Tragic Romanov Sisters of Russia

 

 

The tragic Romanov sisters were the grand duchesses of Russia. They were the four daughters of Tsar Nicholas II and his empress Alexandra. Their names were Olga, Tatiana, Maria and Anastasia in order of birth. These young girls were also the great granddaughters of Queen Victoria as Nicholas and Alexandra were both grandchildren of the queen. It was normal for cousins to marry and interbreed as royalty had to marry royalty not commoners.

However, if the grand duchesses had married even to commoners, their lives may have been saved. Instead, they were murdered at the ages of 22, 21, 19 and just 17 years old, along with their young brother Alexey, just 14. The tsar, tsarina and servants shared their fate of death by firing squad. Such was the tragedy of the Romanov sisters.

Victims of the Russian Revolution

The whole Romanov family were the victims of the Russian Revolution of 1917. Due to social unrest, the progress of WWI and political machinations, the tsar was advised to abdicate in early 1917. Not a strong man or leader, Tsar Nicholas II agreed readily. He unwittingly signed his own death warrant and that of his young family.

The Bolsheviks took control of Russia and imprisoned the royal family in their own beautiful Alexander palace at Tsarskoe Selo near Petrograd. For five months they lived a peaceful domestic existence there under guard. Then the powerful Bolsheviks transported them like prisoners east into Siberia to a town called Tobolsk.

Here in this Siberian backwater, they led a dull existence with no visitors or outings until May 1918.  This date was their scheduled transport to Ekaterinburg further southeast. It would be their final destination and place of execution. Despite this fall from royalty and the consequent change in living conditions, the family remained hopeful and united.

Suffering of the tragic Romanov sisters

According to historian, Helen Rappaport, the family suspected their ultimate fate, especially towards the end at Ekaterinburg. Their living conditions were becoming more dire and heavily guarded. The Red guards mocked them in many acts of disrespect. It is horrible to think of the suffering of these pretty teenage girls, their invalid brother and their devoted parents.

The Romanovs were not nasty people, but a close loving family trapped in the wrong time in history. Nicholas II though born into a royal dynasty was not a natural leader. He preferred the quiet of the countryside, walks, nature and reading. He also was a wonderful, devoted father and husband. His German born wife, Alexandra, also fiercely loved her husband and children. However, she was more autocratic and prouder. As such being German born and appearing haughty, Alexandra became very unpopular with the Russian people especially when she became close to the spiritual monk, Rasputin.

WWI and then the Revolution

Once WWI erupted, Russia and Germany became enemies. Any German affiliation was suspicious, and Alexandra became even less favored. To the Bolsheviks, this was the time to act to depose the 300-year tsardom of Russia.

It did not matter that Alexandra, and her teen daughters were serving as nurses in Petrograd. They worked long days in the hospitals alongside many ordinary Russian women. They loved their country and wanted to be of service. Olga and Tatiana as the older girls dressed wounds, helped in operations and comforted the wounded. They were sisters of mercy and devoted to their country.

The younger girls Maria and Anastasia also volunteered at the hospital after their lessons at the palace. Did this service make them appear less royal? Should they have upheld their position and remained distantly aloof as most royals are?

Four sweet Romanov sisters

When I read about the sisters in Helen Rappaport’s enthralling books, I could only admire their spirit and kindness. They were sweet innocent girls in a time of horrible terror. As sisters they were very close both in age and association. Born just two years apart from each other over a ten-year period; Olga, Tatiana and Maria in the last years of the 1800s, and Anastasia in the new 20th century. Three years later their baby brother, Alexey was born to much fanfare. An heir, a son, at last. The sisters never resented the gender bias of succession. It was normal for the times. Succession was usually via a son not a daughter.

Hemophilia, a German empress and a mad monk

But the long-awaited son had inherited the deadly royal disease of hemophilia. This reality was to seal the Romanov’s fate. Though the family tried to hide this weakness from the world by withdrawing from public events, the truth finally came out as Alexey grew past babyhood.

By then Rasputin was a frequent visitor as he could heal the boy’s bleeds when they occurred. Injuries easily happened due to normal little boy bumps during play.  A frail heir, a mad monk, a German empress; it was not a combination to endear the family to the Russian population. Besides they were at war with Germany, Alexandra’s homeland. The people were also hungry and fearful of the progress of the war.

Ordinary not royal lives

Despite their royal birth, the Romanov sisters had never enjoyed a life of opulence, gala events and public adoration. On the contrary, they spent their young lives mostly at the Alexander Palace doing lessons. They also were dutiful in caring for their ailing mother and brother.

Their mother, Alexandra was not a well woman. She long suffered from neuralgia, sciatica and headaches and then had heart problems too. She often did not attend royal functions with her husband because of these issues. Olga and later Tatiana attended instead. This was unusual and talked about in unflattering terms. Alexandra’s absence was seen as haughtiness. She was not a much-loved empress of the Russian people.

The sisters liked soldiers not princes

For a while, in their later teen years, the older two grand duchesses, Olga and Tatiana attended balls and soirees. The Russian people loved them. They were beautiful and gracious to all. By the time Olga was 18, there was talk of marrying her to Prince Carol of Romania. The families met at the Crimea where they loved to go each summer.

However, Nicholas and Alexandra left the decision to Olga. They wanted her to marry for love as they had. Olga did not fancy Prince Carol nor he, her. Carol preferred her pretty, jolly young sister, Maria. But Maria was too young at the time to marry. So, nothing eventuated.

Olga along with her sister, Tatiana, preferred the company of the handsome soldiers who guarded the palace and royal yacht. Later during the war, they had crushes on soldiers they nursed in the hospital. But always, their royal position prevented an alliance. Olga, Tatiana and later Maria could only dream of these men. They were off limits. The young Romanov sisters would all die virgins, never knowing the physical love of a man. Why didn’t anyone save the Romanovs?

What were the tragic Romanov sisters like?

So, what were these Romanov girls like? As you can see from the photo on the cover of Helen Rappaport’s book, Olga had a wide, pretty face and Tatiana, the beauty, a more delicate appearance like her mother. Tatiana’s eyes were beautiful, and her heart shaped face made her very noticeable as a beauty. She was a devoted daughter and nurse and very organized. Her mother relied on her abilities. Olga could be moody, perhaps understandably as she was denied a normal life for a young woman of her time. Palace life was isolating and denied her socialization with other young people especially men of her age.

Olga, the eldest

By 20, Olga should have married but offers from royal princes did not come. By then the war raged and it was not the time to ally with mighty Russia. Besides by then the royal houses of Europe were aware of the presence of the deadly hemophilia in the Romanov family. They did not want it in their own. Modern DNA analysis of the Romanov sister’s remains proves that only Anastasia, the youngest was a carrier. They need not have feared, but they did. This was natural as there is no cure for haemophilia.

Instead of a life and family of her own, Olga remained with her sisters and parents until 22. It was her age when she, along with her family, faced death by firing squad.

 

Maria and Anastasia

The younger sisters, Maria and Anastasia, had more solid builds than their slender older sisters. Maria had a sweet, happy nature and a lovely smile and eyes. Anastasia the youngest was the plainest looking and a precocious child. She was inattentive to lessons, cheeky and at times disrespectful. Her tutors had a hard time with her. But she did enliven the family gatherings. During the last days of imprisonment in Siberia, it was Anastasia who cheered the freezing government prison house with her charades and one act plays.

The tragic deaths of the Romanov sisters.

One of the last sisterly sessions of camaraderie was a sewing session at the final prison house. The sisters sewed the royal jewels into their dresses to secure them from looting by the Red Guards. Not long after, other guards took the family to the concrete basement of their last prison house in the early hours. Here they lined up with their servants and tutors supposedly for a photograph. It is telling that the usual guards refused to be the assassins of the family. Other men with less allegiance did the killing.

The hired killers sent volleys of bullets towards the unsuspecting family and staff.  Unfortunately, these hidden jewels in the girls’ dresses made the bullets from the murderous firing squad ricochet around the basement. The last jeweled treasures of the glorious Romanov reign prevented a swift death for the girls.

Instead, they suffered in terror as rounds of bullets flew around the bunker, injuring but not killing them. In the end, the assassins used bayonets to kill the innocent young Romanov sisters. An end not fitting for their status nor their kind, innocent souls. It was this terrible savage act that ended the reign of the tragic Romanov sisters. Why didn’t anyone save the Romanovs? Read this previous blog to discover.

Joni Scott is an Australian author with four published books. Whispers through Time and Time Heal my Heart are historical fiction and set in the early 1900s around the era of WWI. The Last hotel and Colour Comes to Tangles are contemporary fiction and set in exotic locations. Visit her website at joniscottauthor.com.

Photo is of the cover of Helen Rappaport’s wonderful historical book.

The mystery ship and the Titanic

The mystery ship and the Titanic

This SS Titanic is one of my history obsessions. As such, it showcases so much of humanity and was a pivotal moment in history, It and the Spanish Flu are bookends to the greater tragedy of WWI. The tragic story of the Titanic still fascinates, despite the ship’s loss over a century ago.

Indeed, The RMS Titanic lives on as a cautionary tale of what can go wrong when ego and greed overpower responsibility and safety concerns. But intriguingly, the mystery of the ‘mystery ship’ sighted by Titanic crew and passengers also endures. The loss of the Titanic affected many lives but just not those aboard. The involvement of other ships in its rescue affected the crew of those ships too.  Read on for details of these mystery ships surrounding the Titanic.

Yes, the Titanic story is one that keeps on giving. There is so much to fascinate, so many lessons about human nature to appreciate and ongoing mysteries to puzzle. What really happened that night onboard the Titanic and the nearby ships?

What caused the Titanic tragedy?

It is telling of human nature that we are drawn to details of tragedies. Perhaps it is because there is so much to take away and reflect on. The factors that caused the real-life Titanic tragedy are themselves endlessly fascinating. In this instance, there were a myriad of fateful errors both human and natural.

Titanic was steaming ahead in a fateful race with Time itself. Captain Edward Smith confidently ordered her throttled into full steam so she could arrive in New York ahead of schedule. He, along with Bruce Ismay, director of White Star Line, wanted to showcase her capabilities as the biggest ship ever to sail the seas. It was Smith’s last commission at sea, so this would be a fitting end to his career. A timely six day crossing of the Atlantic was important for both men. But thousands of others would have preferred to just arrive.

The Titanic had everything but lifeboats

Neither man seemed concerned by reported ice warnings in the ocean ahead. Nor were they overly mindful of their responsibility to the cargo of 2240 passengers considering the paucity of lifeboats. The Titanic had everything anyone could want on board a ship, except enough lifeboats and a pair of binoculars. Those were missing to from the look-out.

There were only enough lifeboats for 1178 people, leaving 1023 others stranded. That is only if the lifeboats were fully loaded, which was definitely not the case. Many that could take 65 people, left with less than twenty aboard. Some of these fortunate passengers were extremely wealthy and influential women along with children and even first-class men. Most second and third-class passengers went down with the ship.

So many fateful errors

If it were not for the speed, the inattention to ice, the lowered bulkheads, the limited lifeboats, the missing binoculars on the watch deck, the poor-quality steel, the pop rivets, the last-minute attempt to swerve around the iceberg…. So many ‘ifs, so many factors that coalesced to cause tragedy. The mysteries surrounding the Titanic are many.

Then, apart from the ship’s construction, the speed and human factors, there was the bad luck that the only nearby ship, the Californian, turned off its telegram service and retired all staff to bed, even after sighting a flare rocket. ‘We thought it was a just a party,’ the captain claimed in defense. Words that went down in history like those of Captain Smith. ‘I cannot imagine any condition which would cause a ship to founder. Modern shipbuilding has gone beyond that.’

The mystery ship nearby

Captain Lord of The Californian would become the scapegoat during the British enquiry into the disaster. However, the Californian lay actually 20 miles to the north of the Titanic and may not have been the mystery ship on the horizon seen from the Titanic. Perhaps it was the crew of the mystery ship now identified as the SS Mount Temple who ignored their duty. This ship was also nearby but on the other side of the deadly icefield.

A night of confusion

The SS Mount Temple responded to the Titanic‘s distress signals on 14 April 1912 but its captain, Capt. Moore, stopped short of helping, He later claimed the ice was too thick to safely pass through. Controversy continues as to the exact position of the SS Mount Temple on tht fateful night. Moore’s recollections of his ship’s true speed and distance from Titanic confound conclusions to this day. Some historians claim that Mount Temple was the ‘mystery ship’ seen by officers and passengers aboard the Titanic five to ten miles away, rather than the SS Californian blamed in the British Inquiry.[1][2]

However, many other experts firmly believe that the ‘Californian‘ was the ship seen from the ‘Titanic‘, and vice versa. This history article is one of many to summarize the findings.

Wrong coordinates for Titanic wreck

One of the most confounding mysteries surrounding the Titanic is why nearby ships did not come to the rescue. Mystery ship, SS Mount Temple stopped to the west of The Titanic disaster site.  The British enquiry overlooked this because the reported disaster site had the wrong coordinates. Only in 1984 when the wreck of the Titanic was discovered were the true coordinates known. Despite being critically damaged by the iceberg, the Titanic drifted, not completely stopping, as first believed. This is one of the mysteries surrounding the Titanic

Quoting Wikipedia, as it explains the matter well,  ‘At a distance of 49.5 nautical miles (91.7 km; 57.0 mi) from the famous distress coordinates of Titanic, and roughly 60 miles (97 km) from the actual location of the disaster, SS Mount Temple was simply too far away to be seen from those aboard Titanic, and for those aboard Mount Temple to see Titanic or her distress rockets. Captain Moore and his crew made a desperate attempt to reach the stricken Titanic but only reached the western side of the ice field that stood between her and the wreck site some 2 hours and 40 minutes after Titanic sank. There was no way that she could have reached Titanic in time to carry out a rescue; she did not ‘abandon’ Titanic.’

A possible rescue?

This seems the consensus of most historians on the SS Mount Temple’s possibility of rendering assistance.

The wireless operator onboard Titanic reported two sets of coordinates, one on either side of the icefield. But not all nearby ships received both as it was very late at night, and some had shut off the Marconi wireless. Smaller ships may not have even had the new innovation of a wireless. Other historians claim it was neither of these nearby ships, the Californian or the Mount Temple, but a northbound Norwegian steamer, named Samson. But this ship was very small and unlikely to be the mystery ship seen that night.

The hope of a rescue was one factor in the reluctance of passengers especially women to board lifeboats and leave the warm comfort of the Titanic. The mystery ship visible on the horizon seemed as if it could come soon to rescue them. The women waited with their men folk and let others board. A lack of urgency led to the boats leaving partially loaded. some with a capacity of 60 left with only a dozen or so, mostly men.

Titanic and its Women Passengers.

Women were also afraid of the drop down to the cold dark sea below. It was 70ft from Boat deck A to the chilly Atlantic. One of the few advantages of being a woman in the Victorian age was chivalry. For those who have no experience of it, chivalry is the social and moral code by which men supposedly, selflessly, respect women. It is definitely a dying art!

In 1912, chivalry dictated that women and children had priority over men, with regards to lifeboats. The problem, of course, was that there were not enough lifeboats, even for the women and children and women were not eager to be in one.

Class onboard Titanic mattered

Sadly, as explained above, most lifeboats left the ship with few onboard and most of these were first-class women and men, and crew. Because, though chivalry was active, class was the dominating decider of who survived.

Third-class women and children had a slim chance of making it on deck, to even try for a lifeboat. There were no lifeboats for third class at all. The rules of the ship restricted third class passengers access to higher decks. This was to avoid mass panic, so the captain maintained, but really it was all about class. James Cameron’s blockbuster, Titanic (1998) portrays this well.

Class and women survivors

The first-class women included the likes of eighteen-year-old Lady Madeleine Astor, the young and pregnant wife of John Jacob Astor. He was the richest man onboard the ship and unlike some first-class men, behaved admirably.  Wealthy Sir and Lady Duff Gordon bribed their way onto a boat and like Bruce Ismay suffered lifelong disgrace.

Rumors abounded that these well-off individuals refused to row back to save others, when the ship finally descended to the icy depths of the Atlantic. The ‘unsinkable Molly Brown’ a nouveau riche society woman tried to influence her fellow passengers in lifeboat 6 to return to help those in the sea.

Most third-class women perished along with their husbands and children, and this was the fate of many second-class women as well. They did not join the ranks of first-class widows who arrived in New York in a state of shock and disbelief. At least they had financial security to continue alone.

Unhappy Survivors

But even these apparently fortunate women who survived, did not live on to have happy lives. The shadow of the Titanic cast a long shadow. The echoes of that night reverberated forever. Many reported that over seventy years later, that they still suffered nightmares and heard the screams from those in the water.  The Shadow of the Titanic follows the ongoing lives of the survivors of that terrible night. Interestingly, most of them lived sad lives and many died young and even quite soon after the event.

The audio memory of the screams of those dying in the icy water, then the silence that followed haunted many survivors.  This was the predominant Some women went insane, committed suicide or just suffered, not only as widows but as remarried women. Many had survivor-guilt and questioned the meaning of life.

Child survivors had similar memories and distress throughout their life. Maybe it was better to drown with your husband and children, than live on as a survivor? Being a third-class widow would have been a difficult role in life in 1912. So many factors compounded to cause the tragedy. There are a lot of ‘if only ifs’ that make this such a human tragedy involving not just nature at work but human nature with all its frailty.

Titanic in Literature

The ill-fated Titanic is the subject of many books such as the definitive A Night to Remember by Walter Lord (1956) and Titanic, An Illustrated History by Don Lynch (1992). The ship features in Stephen Weir’s book, History’s Worst Decisions and is the inspiration for a children’s book called Polar, the Titanic Bear, about the actual teddy bear of a little boy who survived the sinking. The little boy who owned the teddy bear died in a family car crash within a year and is just one example of the long shadow that the Titanic cast over people’s lives. Some folks never recovered from family losses, while others bore survivor’s guilt that prevented their happiness. Because of my obsession with this tragedy, I included the Titanic tragedy in my own historical fiction novel, Whispers through Time, set around 1912.

 

Follow my history blogs on https://joniscottauthor.com

Joni Scott is an Australian author with five published novels, three historical and two contemporary. https://joniscottauthor.com.

error

Enjoy this blog? Please spread the word :)