Month: February 2025

The Sydney Harbour Bridge

The Sydney Harbour Bridge

Today the Sydney Harbour Bridge spans the beautiful and now famous harbour of Sydney, Australia. Tourists flock to explore the harbourside city at the bottom of the world. The Sydney Opera House, well known for its white concrete sails, sits close and just below the grey steel bridge that unites the city, north and south.

But of course, these structures are modern in the overall scheme of things. Australia is a new country compared to Europe and Britain. Its geographic isolation kept it secret and separate until just a few centuries ago. Then Britain colonised its shores in the late 1700s and used the Great Southern Land as a penal colony for surplus convicts.

The dream of a bridge

As early as 1815, architect Francis Greenway proposed a bridge to unite the north and south sides of the vast Sydney harbour. Development of the new city only focused on the south side of the city. Greenway was a convict himself until paroled by the then Governor Macquarie. Francis Greenway was born in Gloucestershire, England. He had a promising career as an architect in the Bristol area until the firm went bankrupt. In March 1812, Greenway was found guilty of the capital charge of forgery. His sentence was commuted to transportation for 14 years to the colony of New South Wales.

Britain’s loss was Australia’s gain. Francis Greenway went on to be the civil architect for Sydney and design many of Sydney’s colonial landmarks that still stand. Governor Lachlan Macquarie employed Greenway’s skills wisely and well.

Governor Macquarie was from Scotland and was an uncle of my Scottish grandmother, Mary Macquarie. Unfortunately, Macquarie did not consider the bridge to be a priority and so it never happened till much later after these two men passed.

A bridge unrealised for many years

Throughout the next century, the 19th, other bridge enthusiasts came and went. However, by the 20th century, the lack of a way across the harbour became more of a priority. People on the north side of the harbour could only access the city and beyond by ferry or punt. This left the beautiful northern side of the harbour quite underdeveloped. The wheels of progress can be slow at times and unfortunately, by the time a draft design for a bridge eventuated, World War I erupted.

Only after the terrible war ended and peace returned did the idea resurface. In 1922, a steel arch bridge was proposed to cross from Dawes Point in the south to Milson’s Point on the northern side, now called the North Shore. The chief engineer was Dr John Bradfield, already the engineer for the Department of Public Works.  Bradfield dreamed of making Sydney the greatest city in the Pacific. Indeed, he had grand ambitions even thinking of another bridge from the North Head to South Head further towards the coastline.

Bradfield did not design the bridge only propose it. It was Ralph Freeman who designed the simple single arch with decorative not functional pylons. Bradfield did not like this design, and the men fought badly both claiming to be the sole designer. When it came to the official plaque, the fight for recognition was really on. The highway across the bridge became the Bradfield Highway and instead, King George VI knighted Freeman for his services.

Work begins on the Sydney Harbour Bridge

Work on the Sydney Harbour bridge started in 1923. This necessitated the demolition of hundreds of houses, shops, hotels and businesses. The authorities did not offer these displaced people anywhere to go or recompence for their property lost. The people moved south, and tent cities sprouted up on the south side of the city near La Perouse. Others moved in with their families. To fund the bridge the government borrowed money from overseas. This caused huge problems when the Great Depression came in 1930. The 1929 Stock crash on Wall Street meant banks started to call in debts. The Australian economy struggled with its funding. Unemployment and homelessness rose steeply.

However, the bridge construction gave work to many, including my grandfather. The bridge united the city in hope at a dark time during the early 1930s. Nicknamed the Iron Lung of the city, the construction employed 1654 workers and kept Sydney alive through the Great Depression. When one shift of riveters or painters finished another surge of workers clocked on. This shared the work between as many men as possible to keep families financially afloat. 4000 men worked on the construction over ten years.

Bridge work was dangerous

Work on the huge steel bridge construction was very dangerous. There were no safety nets or other precautions against falls. Nor did the workers wear safety clothing or helmets as they do today. Sixteen men died by falling either from the arch or pylons or dying at the surrounding work sites. Read about them here.

Most Sydneysiders were unaware of these tragedies.

Set in the early decades of 20th century Sydney, this historical novel completes the tale of two sisters, Winnie and Francesca.

“Those who gave their lives for the bridge were barely acknowledged,” explains Caroline Mackaness, co-author of Bridging Sydney and curator of the exhibition of the same name at the Museum of Sydney.

“The politicians clearly did not want to spoil what was meant to be a joyous occasion, especially at a time of Depression, by drawing attention to the negatives,” she said.

The dramatic bridge opening

Finally, in March 1932, the bridge was complete. The opening ceremony however was plagued by political issues and made world news. For some months, there was civil unrest due to political issues concerning welfare payments and funding for government services. One disgruntled group called the New Guard was opposed to the premier Jack Lang. He was in favour of not repaying the overseas loan but instead helping Sydney and its people. The New Guard feared a revolution and even communism so lobbied to the Governor to have Lang dismissed.

The activist New Guard was also furious that Lang was opening the bridge instead of the king or the governor. As a result of this, Captain Francis de Groot of the New Guard gate crashed the ceremony on horseback and, using a sword, slashed the ceremonial ribbon himself before Premier Lang could do so.

The dead workers honoured

The premier, Jack Lang, made no mention of the deaths. However, the Minister for Public Works laid a modest plaque honouring the men.  It is above the steps on the southern approaches to the bridge but today, it is easily missed by passing pedestrians.

In 2007, the workers who died for their bridge received recognition on the 75th anniversary of the opening. Also, a new plaque was laid in their honour. More can be learnt at the Museum of Sydney located at the corner of Phillip and Bridge streets.

Crossing the Sydney Harbour Bridge

During the opening, an estimated half of the population of Sydney walked across the bridge. This was about 600, 000 people.

In 1982, on the 50th anniversary, about the same number crossed by foot again. By then, you could also cross by car or train. many celebrated this anniversary on ferries or other watercraft or on the nearby foreshores. Sydneysiders love their bridge! Today there are bridge tours and bridge climbs available to the public if you are not height wary.

The Sydney Harbour Bridge remained the symbol of Sydney for many years until the Opera House, built nearby, stole its limelight. It is amazing to reflect that these two structures like many other amazing buildings around the world were built on the sweat of physical workers. No computers, calculators or mobile phones can claim any credit.

Every New Year’s Eve, millions of people gather on the harbour or its foreshores to watch the fireworks herald in the new Year. Australia is always one of the first places in the world to see the new year or century. Our time zone like New Zealand’s is about ten hours ahead of the Uk and Europe.

Read what it was like in the days of the bridge construction in Vashti Farrer’s small book, Sydney Harbour Bridge. Vashti uses the unique voices of two children to tell her Australian story. I read this book and a few others before writing my own historical novel, Last Time Forever which tells the story of two sisters who, at the time and up to 1950, lived in Sydney. Based on the true-life story of my grandparents.

 

 

 

The mysteries surrounding the Titanic

The mysteries surrounding the Titanic

This topic is one of my history obsessions as it showcases so much of humanity.

This tragic tale is endlessly fascinating, despite the ship’s loss to the icy depths of the Atlantic over a century ago.

Even after its sinking on an icy cold April night long ago in 1912, the Titanic has proved to be an unsinkable story of human tragedy.

Indeed, The RMS Titanic lives on as a cautionary tale of what can go wrong when ego and greed overpower responsibility and safety concerns. But intriguingly the mystery of the ‘mystery ship’ sighted by Titanic crew and passengers also endures.

Titanic in Literature

The ill-fated Titanic is the subject of many books such as the definitive A Night to Remember by Walter Lord (1956) and Titanic, An Illustrated History by Don Lynch (1992). The ship features in Stephen Weir’s book, History’s Worst Decisions and is even the inspiration for a children’s book called Polar, the Titanic Bear, about the actual teddy bear of a little boy who survived the sinking. Because of my obsession with this tragedy, I included it in my own historical fiction novel, Whispers through Time as it is set around 1912.

The loss of the Titanic affected many lives but just not those aboard. The involvement of other ships in its rescue affected the crew of those ships too.  Read on for details of these mystery ships and other mysteries surrounding the Titanic.

The Titanic tragedy keeps giving

Yes, the Titanic story is one that keeps on giving. There is so much to fascinate, so many lessons about human nature to appreciate and ongoing mysteries to puzzle. Will we ever know what really happened that night?

But all the tragedy could have been averted if someone like Bruce Ismay, Captain Smith or the ship builder, Thomas Andrew had read another book by a little-known author named Morgan Robertson. In 1898, he wrote a novel about a transatlantic liner loaded with the rich and famous that hit an iceberg near Newfoundland at similar co-ordinates to the 1912 liner. The ship, eerily called the Titan had very similar specifications to the actual Titanic.

If only someone had read this book, aptly titled Futility.

What caused the Titanic tragedy?

It is telling of human nature that we are drawn to details of tragedies. Perhaps it is because there is so much to take away and reflect on. The factors that caused the real-life Titanic tragedy are themselves endlessly fascinating. In this instance, there were a myriad of fateful errors both human and natural.

Titanic was steaming ahead in a fateful race with Time itself. Captain Edward Smith confidently ordered her throttled into full steam so she could arrive in New York ahead of schedule. He, along with Bruce Ismay, director of White Star Line, wanted to showcase her capabilities as the biggest ship ever to sail the seas. It was Smith’s last commission at sea, so this would be a fitting end to his career. A timely six day crossing of the Atlantic was important for both men. But thousands of others would have preferred to just arrive.

The Titanic had everything but lifeboats

Neither man seemed concerned by reported ice warnings in the ocean ahead, nor overly mindful of their responsibility to the cargo of 2240 passengers, despite the paucity of lifeboats. The Titanic had everything anyone could want on board a ship, except lifeboats.

Even at two-thirds capacity of its possible number of passengers, there were only enough lifeboats for 1178 people, leaving 1023 others stranded. That is only if the lifeboats were fully loaded, which was definitely not the case. Many that could take 65 people, left with less than twenty aboard. Some of these fortunate passengers were extremely wealthy and influential women along with children and even first-class men. Most second and third-class passengers went down with the ship.

So many fateful errors

If it were not for the speed, the inattention to ice, the lowered bulkheads, the limited lifeboats, the missing binoculars on the watch deck, the poor-quality steel, the pop rivets, the last-minute attempt to swerve around the iceberg…. So many ‘ifs, so many factors that coalesced to cause tragedy.

Then, apart from the ship’s construction, the speed and human factors, there was the bad luck that the only nearby ship, the Californian, turned off its telegram service and retired all staff to bed, even after sighting a flare rocket. ‘We thought it was a just a party,’ the captain claimed in defense. Words that went down in history like those of Captain Smith. ‘I cannot imagine any condition which would cause a ship to founder. Modern shipbuilding has gone beyond that.’

The mystery ship nearby

Captain Lord of The Californian would become the scapegoat during the British enquiry into the disaster. However, he was actually 20 miles to the north of the Titanic and may not have been the mystery ship on the horizon seen from the Titanic. Perhaps it was the Mount Temple not the Californian. This ship was also nearby but on the other side of the icefield.

A night of confusion

The SS Mount Temple responded to the Titanic‘s distress signals on 14 April 1912 but Capt. Moore, stopped short of helping, claiming the ice was too thick to safely pass through. Controversy continues as to the position of the SS Mount Temple. Moore’s recollections of its true speed and distance from Titanic confound conclusions to this day. Some historians claim that Mount Temple was the ‘mystery ship’ seen by officers and passengers aboard the Titanic five to ten miles away, rather than the SS Californian as implied by the British Inquiry.[1][2]

However, many other experts firmly believe that the ‘Californian‘ was the ship seen from the ‘Titanic‘, and vice versa. This history article is one of many to summarize the findings.

Wrong coordinates for Titanic wreck

Mystery ship, SS Mount Temple stopped to the west of The Titanic disaster site so was overlooked at the British enquiry because the reported disaster site had the wrong coordinates. Only in 1984 when the wreck of the Titanic was discovered were the true coordinates known. Despite being critically injured by the iceberg, the Titanic drifted, not completely stopping as first believed.

Quoting Wikipedia, as it explains the matter well,  ‘At a distance of 49.5 nautical miles (91.7 km; 57.0 mi) from the famous distress coordinates of Titanic, and roughly 60 miles (97 km) from the actual location of the disaster, SS Mount Temple was simply too far away to be seen from those aboard Titanic, and for those aboard Mount Temple to see Titanic or her distress rockets.’

‘Captain Moore and his crew made a desperate attempt to reach the stricken Titanic, but only reached the western side of the ice field that stood between her and the wreck site some 2 hours and 40 minutes after Titanic sank. There was no way that she could have reached Titanic in time to carry out a rescue; she did not ‘abandon’ Titanic.’

This seems the consensus of most historians on the SS Mount Temple’s possibility of rendering assistance.

The wireless operator onboard Titanic reported two sets of coordinates, one on either side of the icefield. But not all nearby ships received both as it was very late at night, and some had shut off the Marconi wireless. Smaller ships may not have even had the new innovation of a wireless. Other historians claim it was neither of these nearby ships, the Californian or the Mount Temple, but a northbound Norwegian steamer, named Samson. But this ship was very small and unlikely to be the mystery ship seen that night.

The hope of a rescue was one factor in the reluctance of passengers especially women to board lifeboats and leave the warm comfort of the Titanic. The mystery ship visible on the horizon seemed as if it could come soon to rescue them. The women waited with their men folk and let others board. A lack of urgency led to the boats leaving partially loaded. some with a capacity of 60 left with only a dozen or so, mostly men.

Titanic and its Women Passengers.

Women were also afraid of the drop down to the cold dark sea below. It was 70ft from Boat deck A to the chilly Atlantic. One of the few advantages of being a woman in the Victorian age was chivalry. For those who have no experience of it, chivalry is defined as the social and moral code by which men supposedly, selflessly, respect women. It is definitely a dying art!

In 1912, chivalry dictated that women and children had priority over men, with regards to lifeboats. The problem, of course, was that there were not enough lifeboats, even for the women and children and women were not eager to be in one.

Class onboard Titanic Mattered

Sadly, as explained above, most lifeboats left the ship with few onboard and most of these were first-class women and men, and crew. Because, though chivalry was active, class was the dominating decider of who survived.

Third-class women and children had a slim chance of making it on deck, to even try for a lifeboat. There were no lifeboats for third class at all. Their access to higher decks was also restricted to avoid mass panic, so the captain maintained, but really it was all about class. This is well portrayed in James Cameron’s blockbuster, Titanic (1998)

Class and women survivors

The first-class women included the likes of eighteen-year-old Lady Madeleine Astor, the young and pregnant wife of John Jacob Astor, the richest man onboard the ship and Lady Duff Gordon. Sir Cosmo Duff Gordon bribed his way onto a boat and like Bruce Ismay suffered lifelong disgrace, due to his cowardice and lack of chivalry.

Rumors abounded that these well-off individuals refused to row back to save others, when the ship finally descended to the icy depths of the Atlantic. The ‘unsinkable Molly Brown’ a nouveau riche society woman tried to influence her fellow passengers in lifeboat 6 to return to help those in the sea.

Most third-class women perished along with their husbands and children, and this was the fate of many second-class women as well. They did not join the ranks of first-class widows who arrived in New York in a state of shock and disbelief. At least they had financial security to continue alone.

Unhappy Survivors

But even these apparently fortunate women who survived, did not live on to have happy lives. The shadow of the Titanic cast a long shadow. The echoes of that night reverberated forever. Many reported that over seventy years later, that they still suffered nightmares and heard the screams from those in the water.

It was not just the screams, but the silence that followed, as a thousand souls died. Some women went insane, committed suicide or just suffered, not only as widows but as remarried women. Many had survivor-guilt and questioned the meaning of life.

Child survivors had similar memories and distress throughout their life. Maybe it was better to drown with your husband and children, than live on as a survivor? Being a third-class widow would have been a difficult role in life in 1912.

There is a book written about the survivors called The Shadow of the Titanic follows the lives of the survivors of that terrible night. Interestingly, most of them had sad lives and many died young and even quite soon after the event.

The little boy who owned the teddy bear died in a family car crash within a year and is just one example of the long shadow that the Titanic cast over people’s lives. Some folks never recovered from family losses, while others bore survivor’s guilt that prevented their happiness.

So many factors compounded to cause the tragedy. There are a lot of ‘if only ifs’ that make this such a human tragedy involving not just nature at work but human nature with all its frailty.

Follow my history blogs on https://joniscottauthor.com

Joni Scott is an Australian author with five published novels, three historical and two contemporary. https://joniscottauthor.com.

error

Enjoy this blog? Please spread the word :)